Search the archives!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Javascript] Fjax - Ajax - eliminate need for browser-specific code
- From: david at dorward.me.uk (David Dorward)
- Subject: [Javascript] Fjax - Ajax - eliminate need for browser-specific code
- Date: Fri Jun 23 10:29:57 2006
On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 10:26:13AM -0500, David Merchant wrote: > " Fjax works a whole lot like Ajax ? it uses an XML file to pass data to a > browser ? except that it uses a tiny bit of Flash, instead of the browser, > to parse the XML. All of that browser-specific code is eliminated, leaving > the application more lightweight and putting less of a strain on the > browser." All that browser specific code? Isn't that about three lines to account for IE 6 and earlier? I don't think embedding a Flash thing in a document is really lighter then three lines of JavaScript. Its also likely to fall foul of things such as Flash-block and not-having-Flash-installed. I'll stick to XMLHttpRequest for that sort of thing. -- David Dorward http://dorward.me.uk
- References:
- [Javascript] Fjax - Ajax - eliminate need for browser-specific code
- From: David Merchant
- [Javascript] Fjax - Ajax - eliminate need for browser-specific code
- Prev by Date: [Javascript] Fjax - Ajax - eliminate need for browser-specific code
- Next by Date: [Javascript] Fjax - Ajax - eliminate need for browser-specific code
- Previous by thread: [Javascript] Fjax - Ajax - eliminate need for browser-specific code
- Next by thread: [Javascript] Fjax - Ajax - eliminate need for browser-specific code
- Index(es):