Search the archives!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Javascript] DOM vs AJAX
- From: mdougherty at pbp.com (Mike Dougherty)
- Subject: [Javascript] DOM vs AJAX
- Date: Tue Jun 20 08:38:46 2006
Matt Warden: > Surely he is not talking about using AJAX as a way of including files. > It's the dynamic content without a page refresh he's after. Michael Borchers: >> with AJAX i would simply store the elements in a seperate file >> and then import it into a <div> Storing elements in a file to be included into a div sounded like SSI to me. If SSI is unavailable (change your web host) you could also use external scripts (which would get cached by the browser as a bonus, at the expense of having to code html in javascript) >> ... DHTML still does not require AJAX. > > And if the number of possible states is large or infinite, then what? Then the page will take a large or infinite time to load. :) Obviously there are correct uses for AJAX. It allows cool things to be done in a browser that were simply not possible before. None of the HowTo I have seen about AJAX discuss when NOT to use it. My two cents was to suggest that there may be other solutions available before relying on AJAX to build a page.
- Follow-Ups:
- [Javascript] DOM vs AJAX
- From: Michael Borchers
- [Javascript] DOM vs AJAX
- From: Matt Warden
- [Javascript] DOM vs AJAX
- References:
- [Javascript] DOM vs AJAX
- From: Michael Borchers
- [Javascript] DOM vs AJAX
- From: Mike Dougherty
- [Javascript] DOM vs AJAX
- From: Matt Warden
- [Javascript] DOM vs AJAX
- Prev by Date: [Javascript] DOM vs AJAX
- Next by Date: [Javascript] DOM vs AJAX
- Previous by thread: [Javascript] DOM vs AJAX
- Next by thread: [Javascript] DOM vs AJAX
- Index(es):