Links

Lists

Latest Updates

Ruby On Rails List
Python list
Advanced Java
The JavaScript List
Apache Users
Full Disclosure
Linux Security

Search the archives!
Having a development problem? Ask eDevelopment.org forums!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Javascript] ISO unobtrusive JS way to change body class

  • From: mdougherty at pbp.com (Mike Dougherty)
  • Subject: [Javascript] ISO unobtrusive JS way to change body class
  • Date: Mon Mar 27 14:57:06 2006
Have you seen this:?  http://www.htmldog.com/ptg/archives/000050.php

On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 14:32:35 -0600
  Scott Moore <moore.scott@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'm working on a proof of concept for a navigation system and am in  need of some help. At the 
>moment, I've got this code:
> 
> <body class="first">
> <ul id="navmenu">
> <li id="first"><a href="#"  onMouseover="document.body.className='first'">First Section</a></li>
> <li id="second"><a href="#"  onMouseover="document.body.className='second'">Second 
>Section</a></li>
> <li id="third"><a href="#"  onMouseover="document.body.className='third'">Third Section</a></li>
> </ul>
> 
> The idea is when you hover over an option, the JS changes the class  of the body tag and the 
>associated sub-menu is displayed. However,  when you roll off an option, the class of the body 
>tag doesn't return  to it's original setting. Now for each section, I could create a  separate 
>nav file and add  onMouseout="document.body.className='current_section'" to each link,  but 
>that's too messy and I want to have only 1 nav file.
> 
> So with the intention of following the idea of unobtrusive JS, I  don't believe I'm heading in 
>the right direction by using  onMouseover. Can anyone point me in the direction I should be going 
>a  cleaner solution?
> 
> Scott
> _______________________________________________
> Javascript mailing list
> Javascript@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.LaTech.edu/mailman/listinfo/javascript
> 
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________________
> This message was scanned by ATX
> 3:33:17 PM ET - 3/27/2006