Search the archives!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Javascript] RegEx for validating a file name
- From: rod.coate at falkirkcollege.ac.uk (Rod Coate)
- Subject: [Javascript] RegEx for validating a file name
- Date: Fri May 20 03:48:29 2005
I am using the filename validation for a html/php contentmanagement system I am creating. (I know that there are plenty of these out there, but I am using this as a project to teach myself php and stretch my javascript knowledge). The idea is that users can create htm files and css files via a web interface. These will then be stored as templates on a mysql database and also as files on the web server. At some point I will probably restrict the file types even more, but I am happy at the moment to just validate the names down to valid file names. I appreaciate all of the comments so far, but as shawn said - the best reply is a relevant answer to the question. Cheers, Rod -----Original Message----- From: javascript-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:javascript-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Shawn Milo Sent: 19 May 2005 19:05 To: [JavaScript List] Subject: Re: [Javascript] RegEx for validating a file name Well, I'm assuming that the OP knew why he wanted it that way. He specified alphanumeric and a three-digit extension, so that's what I matched. I tend to be extremely annoyed when I ask a question on a mailing list and the replies explain why it's a bad idea, rather than how to do it. For example, I found a post yesterday where someone had asked how to mount a Samba share over the internet from their home machine. The only reply was one saying that this was very unsecure and should never be done. I think that this information is useful to the OP, but should only be provided if the reply also contains some kind of answer to the question. I think that people who leave those kind of replies are more interested in appearing smarter than someone else than helping someone else. No offense to Paul and Hassan -- your comments were constructive to the situation in this case. I guess I just felt like bitching about the topic, and the opportunity arose in my 'home' mailing list. Also, I probably felt the need to explain why I provided a solution for what might have been the wrong question -- to be helpful. Shawn On 5/19/05, Paul Novitski <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > At 09:49 AM 5/19/2005, Hassan Schroeder wrote: > >..just want to forget it altogether? :-) > > > >Using Linux/MacOS/Windows, > > > > "log4j.properties" is a valid filename > > "Hassan_Schroeder.resume.pdf" is a valid filename > > "Picture of the Dogs.jpeg" is a valid filename > > > >..none of which would pass the proposed regex. > > Quite right -- one of my brain's feet must have been standing momentarily > in MS-DOSville. > > P. > > > _______________________________________________ > Javascript mailing list > Javascript@xxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.LaTech.edu/mailman/listinfo/javascript > -- Voicemail any time at: 206-666-MILO _______________________________________________ Javascript mailing list Javascript@xxxxxxxxxx https://lists.LaTech.edu/mailman/listinfo/javascript
- Prev by Date: [Javascript] regexp - replace & capture with one operation?
- Next by Date: [Javascript] regexp - how to exclude a substring?
- Previous by thread: [Javascript] RegEx for validating a file name
- Next by thread: [Javascript] NETSCAPE 7.0 (DISABLE CONTROL-CLICK on LINKS)
- Index(es):