Search the archives!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Javascript] Download time
- From: charlie_chan at cox-internet.com (charlie_chan)
- Subject: [Javascript] Download time
- Date: Sat May 31 12:52:38 2003
This is not an answer to your question. It is about .NET . I am coming close to believing the .NET is a resource hog and a drag on performance. This opinion is based on what I have been reading not as a user. What does your experience with .NET indicate? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andrew Gibson" <andyg@xxxxxxxxxx> To: "[JavaScript List]" <javascript@xxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 6:30 PM Subject: [Javascript] Download time > Not really a Javascript problem, though in some ways it is. > > I have a reasonably large DHTML application, around 120kb on the page, > mostly taken up with Javascript code. What are some ideas to speed the > download of the page? > > Im using .net, so even with all the jscript cached on the server, the time > to load is still around 15-20 secs, too long I think. > > I've looked at compression, which looks to cut the time to 20% which is > great, but are there any other techniques, besides effiicent coding ! > > And does the size of the page represent a problem if I get lots of > downloads? > > Cheers > Andrew Gibson > > > _______________________________________________ > Javascript mailing list > Javascript@xxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.LaTech.edu/mailman/listinfo/javascript >
- Follow-Ups:
- [Javascript] Download time
- From: Peter Brunone
- [Javascript] Download time
- References:
- [Javascript] variable undefined problem
- From: Mckinney, Lori K
- [Javascript] Download time
- From: Andrew Gibson
- [Javascript] variable undefined problem
- Prev by Date: [Javascript] Javascript 1.5
- Next by Date: [Javascript] Download time
- Previous by thread: [Javascript] Download time
- Next by thread: [Javascript] Download time
- Index(es):