[Javascript] flash v dhtml

[javascript@xxxxxxxxxx (databarn)]

Flash is nice for a targeted audience that has the same perceptual capabili=
ties as the developer(s).  But you know what . . . I couldn't see the menus=
 on any of the three sites mentioned so far.  I'm at a resolution of 1600x1=
200, and the grey/white on black menus simply do not render well enough to =
read.  On a "normal" (is there such a thing?) site, I can change font size =
- may mess up the developer's concepts, but I can still see the site, get a=
 grasp of what was intended.  Can't do that with flash.  Know a colour-blin=
d guy that just leaves Flash sites - he can't do anything with most of them=
 because of contrast issues.

With something like 10% of the world colour-blind to some extent, and about=
 15% severely visually impaired (don't have reliable stats on this last per=
centage), I just cannot see Flash as a viable entry page to a general popul=
ation commercial site, nor as a primary content container for the pages of =
such a site.  Nice intro to a commercial animation site, though.

Make a good day . . .
			 . . . barn
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Frisbeetarianism: The belief that when you die, your soul goes up on the ro=
of and gets stuck.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 	

_______________________________________
From:	Brian Andrews [bandrews@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
To:	javascript@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	Re: [Javascript] flash v dhtml
Time:	6/29/2001 at 10:50AM

A good example of a site that uses both DHTML and Flash. We even got Flash
and Javascript talking to each other.
    http://www.RiverRunSoul.com

I did the DHTML.


Brian.