Search the archives!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[linux-security] Re: portmap vulnerability?
- From: Matt <panzer@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: [linux-security] Re: portmap vulnerability?
- Date: 12 Dec 1998 06:32:41 GMT
In mail.linux.security Tony Nugent <Tony.Nugent@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
: To make this post worthwhile, where is a snippit out of my own
: /etc/hosts.deny file...
: " | /bin/mail -s "$(uname -n) wrappers\: %d refused for %c" \
: root@localhost ) &
It was very tempting send a pile of spoofed packets into your network to
generate a huge load of email, filling up your mail spool and generating a
nice load on your system. :)
As tempting as this type of logging usually is, perhaps you want to dump
it to a file, instead of having every connection attempted emailed to you,
generating a handful of proccesses while it does so.
[mod: Some remarked that things like "%u" are "client controlled" and
could be used to exploit Tony's system. The manual however claims:
Characters in % expansions that may confuse the shell
are replaced by underscores.
so that should be OK. -- REW]
--
-Matt Drown -- Privacy, Anonyminity, & Security -- DataHaven Project
panzer@xxxxxxx -- Shell and Web accounts -- http://www.dhp.com/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [linux-security] Re: portmap vulnerability?
- From: Tony Nugent
- [linux-security] Re: portmap vulnerability?
- Prev by Date: [linux-security] Re: portmap vulnerability?
- Next by Date: [linux-security] Re: portmap vulnerability?
- Previous by thread: [linux-security] Re: portmap vulnerability?
- Next by thread: [linux-security] Re: portmap vulnerability?
- Index(es):