Search the archives!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
For review: PEP 308 - If-then-else expression
- From: donn at drizzle.com (Donn Cave)
- Subject: For review: PEP 308 - If-then-else expression
- Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 21:41:29 -0000
Quoth Alex Martelli <aleax at aleax.it>: | Andrew Koenig wrote: | ... | > the C++ standard, we received a comment from one country that they | > would not approve the standard as long as it allowed for multiple ways | > of achieving the same affect, and to that end this country insisted | | Heh -- my favourite retort to this kind of extremism, when I hear it | applied to Python, is to feign agreement and then ask whether they'd | prefer Python to forbid "x+1", or "1+x"...;-). Forbid 1+x, thanks. Donn Cave, donn at drizzle.com
- References:
- For review: PEP 308 - If-then-else expression
- From: Andrew Koenig
- For review: PEP 308 - If-then-else expression
- From: Erik Max Francis
- For review: PEP 308 - If-then-else expression
- From: Andrew Koenig
- For review: PEP 308 - If-then-else expression
- From: Aahz
- For review: PEP 308 - If-then-else expression
- From: Andrew Koenig
- For review: PEP 308 - If-then-else expression
- From: Alex Martelli
- For review: PEP 308 - If-then-else expression
- Prev by Date: urllib so slow
- Next by Date: python mysql interfacing
- Previous by thread: For review: PEP 308 - If-then-else expression
- Next by thread: For review: PEP 308 - If-then-else expression
- Index(es):