Links

Lists

Latest Updates

Ruby On Rails List
Python list
Advanced Java
The JavaScript List
Apache Users
Full Disclosure
Linux Security

Search the archives!


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Template


  • From: VShun@xxxxxxxxxxx (Shun, Vadim)
  • Subject: Template
  • Date: Fri, 29 Oct 1999 10:22:49 -0400

I believe templates or parameterized classes are not used for collections
and their absence in Java is truly regrettable. If my memory serves me right
Bruce Eckel in TIJ also regrets it and thinks maybe they (Sun) will add it
in future as this is important feature missing.
UML also defines parameterized classes and devotes substantial chunk to it.
Not to inflame anybody but I think this is clear defitiency of Java as
compared to languages supporting parameterized classes.

Vadim.

-----Original Message-----
From: You-Sheng.Chang@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:You-Sheng.Chang@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, October 29, 1999 10:03 AM
To: advanced-java@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Template




Hi:
     Once some one ask me why Java does not need Template as C++ did. I gave
hime some answer such Java has Collection and interface etc. But I like to
know
what your guys think.

        Thanks

           you sheng



---
To unsubscribe, mail advanced-java-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To get help, mail advanced-java-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

---
To unsubscribe, mail advanced-java-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To get help, mail advanced-java-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx